USPTO serial 76624282
HOLLYWOOD CASINO AT PENN NATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLLYWOOD CASINO AT PENN NATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia G. Cramer
PATRICIA G CRAMER BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of horse races, nightclubs, variety and comedy shows and casinos; gaming facilities featuring slot machines and video lottery terminals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |