USPTO serial 76624337
SPORTLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORTLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerard F. Dunne
GERARD F DUNNE GERARD F DUNNE PC156 5TH AVE STE 1223NEW YORK, NY 10010-7735UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | reflective safety gear, namely, reflective vests, reflective armbands, reflective ankle/shoe band, reflective utility belts, flashing safety lights; armband radio; scale with body fat analyzer sold together as a unit | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2004 |
| 018 | Fanny packs; arm wallets and shoe wallets | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2004 |
| 021 | Water bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2004 |
| 028 | exercise accessories, namely, adjustable ankle weights, torso weights, weighted belts for exercise, back support belts for use during exercise, exercise belt with resistant tubing | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sportline Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by E&B EXERCISE LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SPORTLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |