Drawing for K

USPTO serial 76624492

K

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with K?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Trademark Administrator

Trademark Administrator KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP525 West Monroe St.CHICAGO, IL 60661-3693UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutlery, namely, chefs knives, paring knives, boning knives, hand operated slicers, cleavers, and manually operated knife sharpeners; flatware for table settings, kitchen shears; non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers; non-electric can openersACTIVE—
021Cookware, namely, stock pots, soup pots, sauce pans, skillets, dutch ovens, steamers, casseroles, omelet pans, roasting pans; bakeware, namely, sheet pans, cake pans, tube pans, cake rings, pie pans, loaf pans; china dinnerware; dinnerware; ceramic mugs; beverage glassware; food preparation tools, namely, measuring cups and spoons, whisks, scoops, ladles, spice mills, mixing bowls, colanders, pot and pan scrapers, spatulas, tongs, kitchen forks, kitchen spoons, rolling pins, corkscrews, strainers and sifters; serving forks; serving tongs; serving ladles; serving spoonsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, shorts, pants, sweat pants, sweatshirts, jackets, caps, socks, footwear, chefs hats and apronsACTIVE—
029Canned fruits, canned vegetables, fruit preserves, edible oils, and dipsACTIVE—
030Sauces, marinades, salad dressings, spices, mustard, salsa and coffeeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 28, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2005NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance