USPTO serial 76624501
LOAD-GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2006
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LOAD-GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NATIONAL RUBBER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL RUBBER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Toronto, Ontario M6N 2W3, CA
Toronto, Ontario M6N 2W3, CA
Toronto, Ontario M6N 2W3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria v. Hardison
Maria v. Hardison TASSAN & HARDISON4143 27th St. NorthARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | RUBBER ANTI-SLIP PADS FOR CONTROLLING MOVEMENT OF CARGO IN TRANSPORTATION; RUBBER FRICTION PADS TO SECURE CARGO AND PREVENT DAMAGE DUE TO UNWANTED CARGO SHIFT AND SHOCK DURING TRANSPORTATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL RUBBER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by NRI Manufacturing Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NRI Manufacturing Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NRI Manufacturing Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named LOAD-GRIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 31, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 30, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |