USPTO serial 76624570
CANAL STREET CUTLERY CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CANAL STREET CUTLERY CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Hoyt
CHRISTOPHER HOYT LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER W. HOYT350 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 7315NEW YORK, NY 10118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | CUTLERY, NAMELY POCKET, HUNTING, FISHING, OUTDOORS, CAMPING, KITCHEN, COLLECTORS AND UTILITY KNIVES, KNIFE POUCHES, AND SOFT CASES FOR KNIVES, NAMELY KNIFE ROLLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 26, 2005 |
| 042 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES, MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES, WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES AND WHOLESALE STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CUTLERY, FEATURING POCKET, HUNTING, FISHING, OUTDOORS, CAMPING, KITCHEN, COLLECTORS AND UTILITY KNIVES, BELT BUCKLES, LETTER OPENERS, HATS, AND KNIFE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, KNIFE POUCHES, KNIFE PACKS, KNIFE DISPLAY CASES, KNIFE SHEATHS, AND SOFT CASES FOR KNIVES, NAMELY KNIFE ROLLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 26, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |