USPTO serial 76624611
H
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with H?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, L4K 3Z3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Hale
JOHN S HALE GIPPLE & HALEPO BOX 40513WASHINGTON, DC 20016-0513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | WASTE HAULING, NAMELY, WASTE DISPOSAL FOR OTHERS; OPERATION OF MOBILE PUMPING STATIONS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | TRANSPORTATION OF FREIGHT, NAMELY, LIQUID AND DRY PRODUCTS, BY TRUCK, RAIL, AND AIR FOR OTHERS; LEASING OF TANKER TRUCKS; WAREHOUSE STORAGE OF THE PRODUCTS OF OTHERS; WASTE HAULING, NAMELY, GARBAGE COLLECTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |