Drawing for SCRAMBLE SQUARES/LITTLE GENIUS

USPTO serial 76624697

SCRAMBLE SQUARES/LITTLE GENIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCRAMBLE SQUARES/LITTLE GENIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan E. Grant

JONATHAN E GRANT GRANT PATENT SERVICES2107 HOUNDS RUN PLSILVER SPRING, MD 20906UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028PUZZLES FOR CHILDRENACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 10, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 25, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 25, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 20, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 16, 2006PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jul 17, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 17, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance