USPTO serial 76624811
THE RELOCATION MORTGAGE PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE RELOCATION MORTGAGE PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Laurenzo
BRIAN J LAURENZO DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP801 GRAND AVE STE 3900DES MOINES, IA 50309-2790UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Mortgage Lending Services | ACTIVE | Oct 3, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |