USPTO serial 76624937
MARUKOME MISO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2008
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MARUKOME MISO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nagano City Nagano Prefecture, JP
Nagano City Nagano Prefecture, JP
Nagano City Nagano Prefecture, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheryl L. De Luca
Sheryl L. De Luca Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorARLINGTON, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PROCESSED VEGETABLES, NAMELY, MISO, FERMENTED MISO, BEANS, MISO BEANS, PROCESSED SOY BEANS FOR PRESERVE PURPOSES; AND SOUP STOCKS, NAMELY, MISO FOR SOUP, FERMENTED MISO FOR SOUP, AND INSTANT OR PRECOOKED MISO SOUP | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2007 |
| 030 | Soybean paste, namely, bean paste for miso soup, and bean paste for instant or pre-cooked miso soup; Japanese miso-bean paste; and seasonings | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARUKOME KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by MARUKOME KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by MARUKOME KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MARUKOME MISO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 11, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |