Drawing for MARUKOME TEMPE

USPTO serial 76624938

MARUKOME TEMPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARUKOME TEMPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Adams

Robert W. Adams Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.11th Floor901 North Glebe RoadArlington, VA 22203-1808

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FERMENTED SOYBEAN PASTE; SOYBEAN PASTE; FROZEN VEGETABLES; PROCESSED MEAT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MEATS SEASONED IN SAKE LEES, MEATS SEASONED IN MISO, SEASONED MEATS, DRIED MEATS, SMOKED SAUSAGES, CANNED MEATS AND BOTTLED MEATS; PROCESSED MARINE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FISH AND SHELL FISH PICKLED IN SAKE LEES, FISH AND SHELL FISH PICKLED IN MISO, FISH AND SHELL FISH PICKLED IN SEASONINGS, SMOKED FISH AND SHELL FISH, SALTED AND DRIED FISH AND SHELL FISH, CANNED FISH, BOTTLED FISH, FISH AND SHELL FISH DRIED IN THE SHADE OF THE SUN, BOILED AND DRIED FISH AND SHELL FISH, FISH SAUSAGES, AND PROCESSED FISH PASTES, NAMELY, STEAMED OR TOASTED CAKE OF FISH PASTE; PROCESSED VEGETABLES; INSTANT PRE-COOKED STEW; INSTANT PRE-COOKED SOUP; INSTANT PRE-COOKED MISO SOUPACTIVE—
030JAPANESE MISO-BEAN PASTE; AND SEASONINGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED—
May 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance