USPTO serial 76625088
DICK CEPEK ROUGH COUNTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DICK CEPEK ROUGH COUNTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Schaffer
MARK C SCHAFFER EMCH, SCHAFFER, SCHAUB &PORCELLO CO LPAONE SEAGATE, STE 1980, PO BOX 916TOLEDO, OH 43697-0916Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | tires | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |