Drawing for SOHO RUNWAY

USPTO serial 76625510

SOHO RUNWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOHO RUNWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

Myron Amer Myron Amer, P.C.350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Ladies clothing, namely, dresses, blouses, slacks and fur coatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 22, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 25, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 24, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 10, 2006CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Jul 10, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 1, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance