Drawing for EBLACKBOOK

USPTO serial 76626184

EBLACKBOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EBLACKBOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin D. Walker

ALANA ROSSBOX 964HANA, HI 96713UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and electronic hardware to support the end user of Internet dating services to provide digital communication, contact information management, digital identity management, and candidate selectionACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely books, checklists, page inserts, flash cards, non-fictional books, instructional and teaching materials related to online datingACTIVE—
038Network access to end user for the upload of digital information, namely, electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; Electronic transmission of data, messages, images, and documents; electronic mail services; electronic storage of messages and data; chat services, namely, providing online facilities for real time interaction with other computer users concerning online dating; Providing electronic bulletin boards and message boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning topics of online identity and datingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 24, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2007PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Sep 26, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2007PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jul 11, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 3, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 1, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 2, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 1, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 7, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance