USPTO serial 76626211
SJZ UNIQUE GEAR SINCE 2001
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SJZ UNIQUE GEAR SINCE 2001?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay A. Bondell
JAY A BONDELL SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR AND APPAREL, NAMELY HATS, SWIMSUITS, JACKETS, JERSEYS, JEANS, SHIRTS, SWEAT SUITS, JOGGING SUITS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, HOODED SWEATSHIRTS, UNDERGARMENTS, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, SOCKS, PAJAMAS, BATHROBES, SLIPPERS, FOOTWEAR, HEADBANDS, WRISTBANDS, GLOVES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |