USPTO serial 76626564
REPEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2007
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with REPEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
Abbeville, AL, US
Other trademarks owned by Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
Abbeville, AL, US
Other trademarks owned by Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
Abbeville, AL, US
Other trademarks owned by Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Hardin, Esq.
Peter J. Hardin, Esq. Dentons Sirote PC2311 Highland Ave. S.BIRMINGHAM, AL 35205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | CHEMICALLY TREATED LUMBER; CHEMICALLY TREATED WOOD, NAMELY, WOOD BEAMS, WOOD BLOCKS, WOOD BOARDS, WOOD JOISTS, WOOD POLES, WOOD POSTS, WOOD RAFTERS, WOOD SIDING, WOODEN BEAMS, WOODEN POLES FOR ELECTRIC POWER LINES, WOODEN RAILINGS, AND WOODEN VENEERS | ACTIVE | Oct 9, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named REPEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 13, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 13, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 13, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |