USPTO serial 76626702
GOLDEN FALCON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDEN FALCON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW P. LYNCH
MATTHEW P LYNCH28720 ROADSIDE DR STE 225AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301-4571UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL LADDERS, HAND OPERATED METAL GARDEN HOSE REELS AND METAL CASTERS WITH RUBBER OR PLASTIC WHEELS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | VEHICLE TIRES, NAMELY WHEELBARROW TIRES, GARDEN CART TIRES, HANDTRUCK TIRES, MOTORCYCLE TIRES, AUTOMOBILE TIRES, UTILITY CART TIRES, TRUCK TIRES, TRACTOR TIRES, AND OTHER MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVEN TIRES, WHEELBARROWS, PLATFORM UTILITY CARTS, HANDTRUCKS, TOOL CARTS, GARDEN CARTS, SHOPPING CARTS AND SERVICE CARTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Qingdao Huatian Hand Truck Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Qingdao Huatian Hand Truck Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named GOLDEN FALCON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |