Drawing for C R TOYS

USPTO serial 76626720

C R TOYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with C R TOYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Carrithers

DAVID W CARRITHERS CARRITHERS LAW OFFICE PLLCONE PARAGON CTR6060 DUTCHMAN'S LN STE 140LOUISVILLE, KY 40205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business services, namely, retail, wholesale, on-line, and direct mail sales of toy pedal vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Aug 10, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 8, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance