Drawing for STANLEY STEEMER CARPET CLEANER

USPTO serial 76626860

STANLEY STEEMER CARPET CLEANER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3182239Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with STANLEY STEEMER CARPET CLEANER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sabina A. Vayner

Sabina A. Vayner GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP3333 Piedmont Road NE, Suite 2500Atlanta, GA 30305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Carpet and upholstery cleaning; [ installation, ] repair, [ maintenance ] and cleaning of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems; hardwood floor refinishing; tile and grout cleaning; water damage restoration in the nature of cleaning servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 10, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 10, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Oct 31, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 15, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance