Drawing for SPORT COOLER

USPTO serial 76626979

SPORT COOLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORT COOLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE W. LEWIS

GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009THERMOELECTRIC COOLER/HEATER FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGES; MINI REFRIGERATORACTIVEFeb 21, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 25, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 4, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 4, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 26, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 13, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance