USPTO serial 76627137
MAXI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. Johnson
STEPHEN M JOHNSON3815 BETHMAN RDEASTON, PA 18045-3005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | light carbonated beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |