USPTO serial 76627518
MASLABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3438674Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2008
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MASLABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
Norristown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
Norristown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
Norristown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dirk M Simpson
DIRK M SIMPSON POWELL TRACHTMAN & ET AL475 ALLENDALE RDKING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Mold remediation services; mold prevention treatment of textiles, clothing rugs and drywall, none of the above services utilizing mass spectrometry or mass spectroscopy analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 042 | Environmental testing, namely, indoor air quality testing, inspecting buildings for the existence of mold, sampling for molds by means of air sampling machines, none of the above services utilizing mass spectrometry or mass spectroscopy analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Microbiological Air Safety Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MASLABS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |