Drawing for FRIENDSHIP

USPTO serial 76627599

FRIENDSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRIENDSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned T. Himmelrich

NED T HIMMELRICH GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-3332UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal key rings and metal key chains; figurines of metal, pewter figurines; home decor items of metal, namely, trinket boxesACTIVE—
014Jewelry, jewelry of precious metals, jewelry of precious stones, jewelry of semi-precious stones, jewelry of non-precious metals, badges of precious metals, and sculptures of precious metals; clocksACTIVE—
020Non-metal key rings and non-metal key chains; photograph frames; mirrors; trinket boxes not of metalACTIVE—
021Decorative figures, figurines, ornaments, statues, statuettes and home decor items, namely, vases, candleholders and sculptures, all of or principally of glass, ceramics, earthenware, china or porcelain; tea sets; tea pots not of precious metal; mugs; collectors' plates; wall plates; window ornaments of glass; window ornaments of stained glass; paper plates; coasters of melamine, wood or wood substituteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 11, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance