USPTO serial 76627826
HYPERTEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYPERTEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Colleyville, TX
Arlington, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Crutcher
Thomas A. Kulik Scheef & Stone, LLP500 N. Akard, Ste 2700Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail and on-line store services featuring well-site monitoring equipment, software and wireless web server gateways; retail and online store services featuring gas extraction, detection and chromatography apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |