USPTO serial 76627829
EAT WELL. LIVE WELL.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAT WELL. LIVE WELL.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy L. Deutmeyer
Tracy L. Deutmeyer McGrath North Mullin & Kratz, PC LLO1601 Dodge StreetSuite 3700, First National TowerOmaha, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Beef; beef cuts; pork; pork cuts; poultry; poultry cuts; seafood; fried chicken; chicken patties; chicken nuggets; chicken strips; chicken breasts; hams; bacon; pepperoni; hot dogs; franks; bratwurst; knockwurst; jerky, sausage; breakfast sausage; smoked sausage; summer sausage; pickled sausage; meatballs; imitation seafood; corned beef hash; soy-based meat substitutes; egg substitutes; frozen prepared meals and entrees consisting primarily of beef, pork, poultry, seafood or vegetables; frozen prepared meals consisting primarily of a chicken, fish, or corn dog main dish together with one or more side dish, dessert and/or dipping sauce; packaged combination consisting primarily of meat and cheese with crackers; cold cuts; deli meats; processed potatoes; hash brown potatoes; French fries; refried beans; sauerkraut; baked beans; processed pinto beans; canned pork and beans; soup; stew; chili; canned tomatoes; tomato paste; tomato puree; vegetable puree; processed garlic; processed onion; dehydrated vegetables; cheese; cooking oils; cooking sprays; peanut butter; jams; jellies; margarine; margarine spreads; pickles; processed sunflower seeds; dairy based whipped topping; and non-dairy based whipped topping | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen prepared meals and entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; frozen prepared meals consisting primarily of a pasta, cheeseburger sandwich, pizza, or taco main dish and one or more side dish, dessert, and/or dipping sauce; pizza; pizza sauce; pot pies; breakfast sandwiches; burritos; enchiladas; tacos; tamales; taquitos; egg rolls; gravy; ketchup; mustard; barbecue sauce; rice; pasta; pasta sauce; pasta and meatballs; pasta and sauce; canned pasta; lasagna; macaroni and cheese; ravioli; sloppy joe sauce; soy sauce; tomato sauce; salsa; seasonings; flour; bread; processed grains; microwave popcorn; unpopped popcorn; bakery goods; baking mixes; dessert mixes; fruit cobbler mixes; fruit crisp mixes; pie mixes; cake mixes, cocoa mixes; toppings syrups; frozen confections; ice cream; pudding; and flavored edible gel snacks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONAGRA FOODS RDM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EAT WELL. LIVE WELL.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |