USPTO serial 76627857
CORAZÓN BY CHICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORAZÓN BY CHICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Fernando, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colin P. Abrahams
COLIN P ABRAHAMSWARNER CTR5850 CANOGA AVE STE 400WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-6554Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry; jewelry bracelets, necklaces, jewelry chains, charms; watches and clocks, watch straps and bands, watch cases; earrings, rings as jewelry | ACTIVE | Feb 14, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |