USPTO serial 76627933
NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexis Slagle Gilroy
ALEXIS SLAGLE GILROY EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN PC1227 25TH ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1175UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable electronic publications in the nature of reports in the field of healthcare quality measurement and reporting; and electronic publications, namely, reports in the field of healthcare quality measurement recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | Aug 7, 2000 |
| 016 | printed publications in the field of healthcare quality measurement and reporting, namely newsletters, reports, pamphlets, brochures and posters related to developing and implementing consensus-based national standards for healthcare performance | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2002 |
| 035 | conducting quality assurance surveys of the standards and practices of hospitals, nursing homes, physician's practices, and other healthcare providers to determine service quality | ACTIVE | Apr 21, 2000 |
| 041 | educational services in the field of healthcare quality measurement, namely conducting seminars, conferences, meetings and workshops to develop and implement consensus-based national standards for healthcare performance and distributing course materials in connection therewith; publication of printed matter, namely, newsletters, reports, pamphlets, brochures and posters related to developing and implementing consensus-based national standards for healthcare performance; on-line publication of newsletters and reports related to developing and implementing consensus-based national standards for healthcare performance; and providing newsletters and executive summaries in the field of healthcare quality measurement and reporting via e-mail | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 1999 |
| 042 | providing quality assurance services in the field of healthcare, namely, reviewing standards and practices in the field of healthcare to develop and implement national voluntary consensus-based standards for healthcare quality measurement; accreditation services, namely, reviewing, analyzing and evaluating standards and practices in the field of healthcare for the purpose of certification; and providing online information about healthcare quality measurement and standards by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Apr 21, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Quality Forum
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |