USPTO serial 76627934
NQF-ENDORSED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3349017Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NQF-ENDORSED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexis Slagle Gilroy
ALEXIS SLAGLE GILROY EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN PC1227 25TH ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1175UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable electronic publications in the nature of reports in the field of healthcare quality measurement and reporting; and electronic publications, namely, reports in the field of healthcare quality measurement recorded on computer media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2005 |
| 016 | printed publications in the field of healthcare quality measurement and reporting, namely newsletters, reports, pamphlets, brochures and posters related to developing and implementing consensus-based national standards for healthcare performance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2005 |
| 035 | conducting quality assurance surveys on the use of the standards and practices of hospitals, nursing homes, physician's practices, and other healthcare providers to determine service quality | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 12, 2006 |
| 041 | educational services in the field of healthcare quality measurement, namely conducting seminars, conferences, meetings and workshops to develop and implement consensus-based national standards for healthcare performance and distributing course materials in connection therewith; publication of printed matter, namely, newsletters, reports, pamphlets, brochures and posters related to developing and implementing consensus based national standards for healthcare performance; on-line publication of newsletters and reports related to developing and implementing consensus-based national standards for healthcare performance; and providing newsletters and executive summaries in the field of healthcare quality measurement and reporting via e-mail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 5, 2007 |
| 042 | providing quality assurance services in the field of healthcare, namely, reviewing standards and practices in the field of healthcare to develop and implement national voluntary consensus-based standards for healthcare quality measurement; accreditation services, namely, reviewing, analyzing and evaluating standards and practices in the field of healthcare for the purpose of certification; and providing online information about healthcare quality assurance and performance measurement and standards by means of a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Quality Forum
- Other trademarks owned by National Quality Forum
- Other trademarks owned by National Quality Forum
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NQF-ENDORSED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |