USPTO serial 76627945
THE VIPER PROTECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE VIPER PROTECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abbotsford, British Columbia, CA
Abbotsford, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Weldon F. Green
Weldon F. Green Weldon F. Green, Co.31 Adelaide St., EastBox 1111Toronto, ON M5C 2K6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | truncheons, namely, night sticks with incorporated personal defence sprays sold as a unit therewith; batons, namely a personal defence baton with incorporated personal defence spray sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |