USPTO serial 76628157
INSTITUTE OF REGIONAL FINE FRENCH CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTITUTE OF REGIONAL FINE FRENCH CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely soups; prepared meals namely, prepared meals consisting principally of meat, vegetables and/or pasta; meat, poultry and fish of all kind; meat balls stew, chicken stew, simmered dishes ready-to-serve; ham terrines, chicken terrines, chilli spread, ham pates, liver pates, country-style pates, merchant pates, meat pates namely ham, pork, veal and/or chicken pates, boneless chicken, meat loaves, Irish stew, chicken flakes, ham flakes, blood sausage, pickled tongues, spreads, condiments, pork beans, pasta, dill pickles; sauces, namely hot sandwich sauce, bar-b-Q sauce, sauce for meatballs stew, sauce for meatloaves, sauce for poutine, dijonnaise, of Bordeaux, sauce for meats, beef sauce, three peppers sauce, mushroom sauce, chicken sauce, turkey sauce, fruit jams, fruit jellies; preserved, frozen, dried, in vacuum, cooked and fresh vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit drinks, non-alcoholic vegetable juices | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | Conferences, namely organising and arranging conferences, organising and arranging educational conferences in the field of gastronomy; sponsorship of various events, services related to gastronomy, namely organising gastronomic meals, organising gastronomic clubs, promoting gastronomy; communications, namely, radio and television broadcasting in the field of gastronomy; organising and accounting festivals in the field of gastronomy; catering services, gastronomical restaurants; designing and consulting services in the field of gastronomy; services of conception and production of events such as country celebrations, gastronomic events and gatherings and culinary fairs; services of production of exhibits relating to cooking, gastronomy and the art of the table; services of organization of tasting of gastronomic products, namely-- of food and wines; educational services, namely personnel training in gastronomy; consultation services in the field of administration of food stores | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Institut Culinaire du Terroir Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named INSTITUTE OF REGIONAL FINE FRENCH CUISINE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |