Drawing for INSTITUTE OF REGIONAL FINE FRENCH CUISINE

USPTO serial 76628157

INSTITUTE OF REGIONAL FINE FRENCH CUISINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INSTITUTE OF REGIONAL FINE FRENCH CUISINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food products, namely soups; prepared meals namely, prepared meals consisting principally of meat, vegetables and/or pasta; meat, poultry and fish of all kind; meat balls stew, chicken stew, simmered dishes ready-to-serve; ham terrines, chicken terrines, chilli spread, ham pates, liver pates, country-style pates, merchant pates, meat pates namely ham, pork, veal and/or chicken pates, boneless chicken, meat loaves, Irish stew, chicken flakes, ham flakes, blood sausage, pickled tongues, spreads, condiments, pork beans, pasta, dill pickles; sauces, namely hot sandwich sauce, bar-b-Q sauce, sauce for meatballs stew, sauce for meatloaves, sauce for poutine, dijonnaise, of Bordeaux, sauce for meats, beef sauce, three peppers sauce, mushroom sauce, chicken sauce, turkey sauce, fruit jams, fruit jellies; preserved, frozen, dried, in vacuum, cooked and fresh vegetablesACTIVE—
032non-alcoholic fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit drinks, non-alcoholic vegetable juicesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
041Conferences, namely organising and arranging conferences, organising and arranging educational conferences in the field of gastronomy; sponsorship of various events, services related to gastronomy, namely organising gastronomic meals, organising gastronomic clubs, promoting gastronomy; communications, namely, radio and television broadcasting in the field of gastronomy; organising and accounting festivals in the field of gastronomy; catering services, gastronomical restaurants; designing and consulting services in the field of gastronomy; services of conception and production of events such as country celebrations, gastronomic events and gatherings and culinary fairs; services of production of exhibits relating to cooking, gastronomy and the art of the table; services of organization of tasting of gastronomic products, namely-- of food and wines; educational services, namely personnel training in gastronomy; consultation services in the field of administration of food storesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance