Drawing for Serial No. 76628206

USPTO serial 76628206

Serial No. 76628206

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 76628206?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara H. Loewenthal

BARBARA H LOEWENTHAL GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Potato products, with or without flavor modifiers, namely potato crisps, potato-based snack foods and potato chips; french fries potatoes; and prepared or packaged vegetable based snack foods, snack food consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetablesACTIVE—
030Potato products with or without flavored modifiers, namely potato flour, rice based snack foods and corn based snack foods; savory biscuitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 23, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 9, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 11, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 11, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 24, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 11, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 10, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance