USPTO serial 76628520
CREDIT UNION CHERRY BLOSSOM TEN MILE RUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CREDIT UNION CHERRY BLOSSOM TEN MILE RUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi K. Abegg
HEIDI K ABEGG WEBSTER, CHAMBERLAIN & BEAN1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4693UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fundraising | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |