CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AEGIS

USPTO serial 76628569

AEGIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AEGIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Woldow

Scott D. Woldow SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NWSuite 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Import agency services of medicines and preparations of veterinary medicine, wholesale distributorships featuring medicines and preparations of veterinary medicine; business consulting and management in the field of clinical trials, namely, clinical data and regulatory submission management to assist third parties in clinical research and trials and drug approval applications; Business consulting and management in the field of regulatory submission management on behalf of medical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to assist them with applications for drug approvalABANDONED—
042Development of medicines for others; development of veterinary medicines for others; conducting clinical trials for medicines of others; Providing technical consulting services and information management services, namely, clinical data and regulatory submission management to medical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to assist them with clinical research, clinical trials and applications for drug approval; Regulatory submission management, namely, assisting others in preparing and filing applications for new drugs with governmental regulatory bodies; Consulting services in the field of listing and tracking of foreign and domestic government regulatory requirements, for obtaining permits and regulatory compliance; Regulatory compliance consulting as it applies to prescription drug sampling; Consulting services in the field of medical product approval for commercial purposesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 31, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2009CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 3, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 16, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 19, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 18, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance