USPTO serial 76628758
AROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONN K. HARMS
DONN K HARMS PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW CTR12702 VIA CORTINA STE 100DEL MAR, CA 92014-3769UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric and non electric citrus juicers and juice extractors; meat grinders; electric coffee grinders; hand and stand mixers; electrics knives and electric knife sharpeners; electric can openers; electric pasta makers; vacuum cleaners; floor polishers; and dish washers | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 1999 |
| 008 | Non-electric knives, namely slicing knives, utility knives, grapefruit knives, French cook's knives, and cleavers; game shears; knife sharpeners; apple corers; can openers; jar-top openers; choppers; ice crushers; and hand operated grinders | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 1999 |
| 011 | Electrical appliances, namely, rice cookers, deep fryers, fry ovens toasters, toaster ovens, ice cream makers, yogurt makers, kettles, slow cookers, rotisserie toaster ovens, pizza ovens, thermoelectric coolers, hot plates, microwave ovens, popcorn makers, cotton candy makers, pressure cookers, convection ovens, grills, skillets, woks, rice cookers, sandwich toasters, waffle irons, bread cookers, potato cookers, blenders, food dehydrators, food processors, coffee or tea percolators, sauce pans, tortilla cookers, pizza cookers, smokers, food steamers, electric and battery operated aromatherapy units, stew cookers, DSQ grills, air conditioners, heaters, humidifiers, air purifiers, household air cleaners, water coolers, cooking ranges, hot water heaters, water purifiers, microwave clothes dryers, refrigerators, electric ranges, stoves, and humidifiers | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 1999 |
| 021 | Non-electrical items, namely, pressure cookers, rice and bean containers which contain a mechanism for dispensing the rice and beans, skillets, woks, sauce pans, air pots, spatulas, basting spoons, cheese graters, vegetable-cleaning brushes, brushes for applying liquids or gels to pastry dough, bottle openers, colanders, pepper grinders, baking pans, omelet pans, griddles, coffee pots not of precious metal, tea kettles, dutch ovens, garlic presses, flour sitters, wire whisks, strainers, mouli graters, food canisters, combs, sponges for household purposes, brushes for basting, beverage glassware, pails, iron pans, aluminum pans, plastic pans, candle extinguishers not of precious metal, dish stands, plastic storage containers for domestic use, napkin holders, paper towel holders, cutting boards, juice pitchers, cookie jars, salt and pepper shakers, lazy susans, plates and utensils and wine coolers | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chang, Peter Chung-Yuan
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named AROMA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |