USPTO serial 76628792
CUSTOM REPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUSTOM REPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Thomas
JOHN A THOMAS GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY PC2200 ONE GALLERIA TWR13355 NOEL RD L B 48DALLAS, TX 75240-1518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Consultation services in the field of remanufacturing motor-vehicle engines for others; remanufacture of motor-vehicle engines for others | ACTIVE | Apr 10, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |