USPTO serial 76628975
PRECISION MUSCULAR PRESSING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRECISION MUSCULAR PRESSING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Rehabilitation therapy services in the nature of a hands on approach for identifying and treating myofascial tightness throughout the body, applied at various levels of pressure depending on the client's level of inflammation and sensitivity, to muscles that have been identified by the therapist as contracted and causing a specific symptom, performed by a manual therapist along the entire length of the muscle back and forth in intervals of raising and lowering palpitations by either utilizing a therapist's elbow or their thumbs over thumb | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUTTMAN-BUTLER, GEORGETTE
- Other trademarks owned by SUTTMAN-BUTLER, GEORGETTE
- Other trademarks owned by SUTTMAN-BUTLER, GEORGETTE
- Other trademarks owned by BUTLER, JAMES JON
- Other trademarks owned by BUTLER, JAMES JON
- Other trademarks owned by BUTLER, JAMES JON
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named PRECISION MUSCULAR PRESSING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RPUB | NOA CANCELLED; REPUBLICATION REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |