Drawing for ROC LA FAMILIA

USPTO serial 76629107

ROC LA FAMILIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDGE, KATRINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROC LA FAMILIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose

BRAD D ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10022-4441UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Record and music production; audio recording and production; music composition and transcription for others; song writing services; music publishing services; entertainment in the nature of a live musical performer, musical band or musical group; entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical artist, musical group or musical band; entertainment, namely, live music concerts; entertainment, namely, personal appearances by a musician, musical group or musical band; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, commentary and articles about music, all online via a global computer network; entertainment in the nature of traveling tours featuring music, drama, spoken word and comedyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 25, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance