USPTO serial 76629132
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Anyang-City, Gyounggi-Do, KR
Anyang-City, Gyounggi-Do, KR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Y. Kang
JONATHAN Y. KANG LEE, HONG, DEGERMAN, KANG & SCHMADEKA660 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER DEVICES, NAMELY, NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS, LAPTOP COMPUTERS, WORD PROCESSORS, WORK STATIONS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER MONITORS, COMPUTER KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS, COMPUTER MEMORY, HARD DISK DRIVES, GRAPHIC PROCESSING UNITS, NETWORK CONNECTING DEVICES AND COMMUNICATIONS LINKS, COMPUTER MONITORS, ELECTRONIC TRANSLATORS, PDA, INTERNET COMPUTER TERMINALS, KEYBOARDS,ELECTRONIC CALCULATORS, ELECTRONIC NOTEPADS, VIDEO GAME PLAYERS, DISK DRIVES, MODEMS, MOUSE, ELECTRONIC JUKEBOXES AND COMPUTER MOTORS IN THE NATURE OF CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS; ELECTRONIC MEDIA DEVICES, NAMELY, VIDEO TRANSMITTERS, VIDEO RECEIVERS, ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS, BROADCAST AUDIO AND VIDEO RECEIVERS, VIDEO PLAYERS, AUDIO PLAYERS, RECORD PLAYERS, DVD PLAYERS, MP3 PLAYERS AND TELEVISIONS; ELECTRONIC STORAGE DEVICES, NAMELY, MEMORY DEVICES IN THE NATURE OF FLASH MEMORIES, READ AND WRITE MEMORIES, ROM MEMORIES, ELECTRICALLY ERASABLE AND WRITABLE MEMORIES AND BLANK DISKS; SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, WORD PROCESSING AND SUPPORTING NETWORK CONNECTIVITY | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |