USPTO serial 76629242
DWELLBABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DWELLBABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria v. Hardison
MARIA V. HARDISON TASSAN & HARDISON4143 27TH STREET NORTHARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | CRIBS AND CHANGING TABLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | BASKETS MADE OF STRAW, CLOTH, AND WICKER AND WASTE BASKETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | TOWELS, BLANKETS, DUVET COVERS, DUVETS, QUILTS, FABRIC VALANCES, DRAPERIES, AND TEXTILE FABRICS FOR USE IN COVERING BASKETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | BABY CLOTHING, NAMELY, LAYETTE, ONE PIECE BODY SUITS, PAJAMAS, SLEEPWEAR, WEARABLE SLEEPING SACKS, BABY HATS, CAPS, SOCKS, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, PANTS, SKIRTS, TOPS, BLOUSES, DRESSES, SWEATERS, JACKETS, SHORTS, AND CLOTH BIBS | ABANDONED | — |
| 027 | RUGS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | DECORATIVE CRIB MOBILES, TOY CRIB MOBILES, STUFFED TOYS, STUFFED ANIMALS, AND TOYS, NAMELY, ACTIVITY TOY FOR BABIES AND INFANTS, CONSISTING OF AN ACTIVITY BLANKET, FLEXIBLE ARCHES, TOY MOBILES, PLASTIC TOY ANIMALS, TEETHING TOYS, STUFFED TOYS, SQUEAKER TOYS, MUSICAL TOYS, AND PLASTIC HOOKS ALL SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Designspace, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Designspace, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DWELL HOME FURNISHINGS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DWELLBABY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |