Drawing for INFINITI

USPTO serial 76629313

INFINITI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFINITI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George L. Pinchak

George L. Pinchak Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP1300 East Ninth StreetSuite 1700Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical controllers for commercial and industrial weighing equipmentABANDONEDJan 21, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 31, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 31, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance