USPTO serial 76629397
SILENT FIREMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILENT FIREMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher John Rudy
209 HURON AVE STE 8PORT HURON, MI 48060-3860UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Fire retardant and fire reactant paints, coatings, sprays, and compositions in the nature of paint;aqueous fire retardant and fire reactant paints, coatings, sprays, and compositions in the nature of paint; fire retardant and fire reactant paints, coatings, sprays, and compositions in the nature of paint, contained in kits comprising at least one of said paints, coatings, sprays, and compositions in the nature of paint, plus an instruction sheet; aqueous fire retardant and fire reactant paints, coatings, sprays, and compositions in the nature of paint, contained in kits comprising at least one of said paints, coatings, sprays, and compositions in the nature of paint, plus an instruction sheet; fire retardant and fire reactant paints, coatings, sprays, and compositions in the nature of paint, applied to residential and commercial building structures and their contents; aqueous fire retardant and fire reactant paints, coatings, sprays, and compositions in the nature of paint, applied to residential and commercial building structures and their contents | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Inspection services, namely inspecting the application of fire retardant agents in residential and commercial structures and their contents and providing a fire resistance rating based upon the inspection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |