Drawing for FIREFLY VINEYARDS OF ARRINGTON, TENNESSEE.

USPTO serial 76629409

FIREFLY VINEYARDS OF ARRINGTON, TENNESSEE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIREFLY VINEYARDS OF ARRINGTON, TENNESSEE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman Gillis

Norman Gillis NORMAN GILLIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.1208 16TH AVENUE SOUTHLL1NASHVILLE, TN 37212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Vineyard services, namely cultivation of grapes for the commercial production and sale of winesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 17, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 14, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 6, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance