USPTO serial 76629666
PRINCESS NATASHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRINCESS NATASHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Bush
Douglas R. Bush Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded audio and video tapes, CDs, and DVDs featuring animated cartoons and motion picture films; computer software to allow users to access networked computers, computer software, databases, communications services, and electronic communications networks; computer software for data, text, graphics, and image transmission; computer software for browsing and searching among electronic communications networks, computers, computer software, and databases; computer hardware; video game cartridges; eye glass frames; telephones; cell phones | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Children's books; coloring books; sticker albums; trading cards, posters, calendars, sheet music, stickers, printed paper invitations, removable decal tattoos, photograph and scrapbook albums, and writing instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Back packs, umbrellas, luggage, wallets, key cases, purses; small leather goods, namely, coin purses, travel kits in the nature of travel and toiletry cases and bags sold empty, cosmetic bags sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture; home furnishings, namely, picture frames not of metal, jewelry boxes not of metal, and chests, namely, toy chests, chests of drawers, and furniture chests | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Towels, bed linens, bed covers, bed spreads, table linens, textile place mats, comforters, bed sheets, dust ruffles, duvet covers, pillow shams, bedspreads, and curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Wearing apparel, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, sleepwear, shorts, coats, socks, footwear, clothing belts, bandannas, sweaters, dresses, gloves, mittens, hats, scarves, gym shorts, ear muffs, neckwear, pajamas, pants, shirts, ski wear, slacks, sun visors, suspenders, turtlenecks, underclothes, underwear, vests, warm-up suits, headwear, bathrobes, beachwear, Halloween costumes | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Floor coverings; wall hangings, namely, non-textile wall hangings and wallpaper | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, action games, board games, card games, stuffed toys, stuffed toy animals, toy action figures and accessories therefor, toy figures, magnetic toy figures, plastic and ceramic molded toy figurines, jigsaw puzzles, kites, dolls, beach toys, namely, inflatable beach toys and swim floats for recreational use, bath toys, hand held units for playing electronic and video games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA ONLINE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AOL LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AOL LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kanonen & Bestreichen
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PRINCESS NATASHA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |