USPTO serial 76630101
BOTTLE MATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOTTLE MATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oshawa, Ontario, CA
Oshawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Mallinckrodt
ROBERT R MALLINCKRODT THORPE N & WESTERN LLPPO BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | baby bottle retention straps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |