Drawing for INTELLITAG GEN2

USPTO serial 76630298

INTELLITAG GEN2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLITAG GEN2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle D. Kahn

MICHELLE D KAHN SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR17TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4106

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless data transmission and security systems comprised of magnetically coded radio-frequency identification computer chips, magnetically encoded radio frequency smart cards in the form of a tag, blank smart cards, radio frequency identification chip and tag interrogators, and card and tag printers; magnetically encoded identification cards and card readers; handheld computer scanners; magnetic coded card reader; magnetically coded proximity cards; radio-linked computer hardware, namely, Ethernet controllers, terminals, docking stations, and computer peripherals; and computer software for access and security control of radio linked wireless security systems, all for use in the fields of intelligent transportation, electronic security and access control, asset tracking and control and electronic payment management; Coated and uncoated paper embedded with radio-frequency identification cards, chips, and tags; machine-perceptible or human readable paper labels having radio frequency identification (RFID) chips or tags, electronic article surveillance (EAS) chips or tags, magnetically encoded identification chips or tags, and remote wireless information storage chips or tags, affixed or embedded thereonACTIVE—
037Installation and maintenance of computer hardware for wireless data transmission and security systems in the fields of intelligent transportation, electronic security and access control, asset tracking and control and electronic payment managementACTIVE—
042Design and consultation services for wireless data transmission and security systems in the fields of intelligent transportation, electronic security and access control, asset tracking control and electronic payment managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 9, 2008ZZAXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU—
Jul 7, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 13, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 19, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 19, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 19, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 11, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance