USPTO serial 76630394
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, JP
Osaka, JP
TAKATSUKI, OSAKA 569-1134, JP
TAKATSUKI, OSAKA 569-1134, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur S. Garrett
Arthur S. Garrett FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Adhesives for industrial use, namely, adhesives for use in electronics industry, adhesives for automobile/motorcycle use, adhesives for use in building and construction; adhesive sealants for automobile/motorcycle use, namely, automobile brake system leak sealants, automobile cooling system leak sealants, sealants for use on steel plate seam joints on the automobile body, between the automobile body and the window glass, and around the taillights; fillers for automotive body for reinforcing and shock proofing purpose, namely, cavity fillers and reinforcing agents for automobiles; fillers for electronic components for adhesion and shock proofing purposes, namely, epoxy resins for use as underfill materials; liquid elastomers, namely, thermoplastic urethane elastomers in liquid form for use in manufacturing in a wide variety of industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Sealant for industrial use, namely adhesive sealant for use in electronics industry; adhesive sealant for use in building and construction | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2008 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |