Drawing for ECO-CART

USPTO serial 76630394

ECO-CART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO-CART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur S. Garrett

Arthur S. Garrett FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Adhesives for industrial use, namely, adhesives for use in electronics industry, adhesives for automobile/motorcycle use, adhesives for use in building and construction; adhesive sealants for automobile/motorcycle use, namely, automobile brake system leak sealants, automobile cooling system leak sealants, sealants for use on steel plate seam joints on the automobile body, between the automobile body and the window glass, and around the taillights; fillers for automotive body for reinforcing and shock proofing purpose, namely, cavity fillers and reinforcing agents for automobiles; fillers for electronic components for adhesion and shock proofing purposes, namely, epoxy resins for use as underfill materials; liquid elastomers, namely, thermoplastic urethane elastomers in liquid form for use in manufacturing in a wide variety of industriesACTIVE—
017Sealant for industrial use, namely adhesive sealant for use in electronics industry; adhesive sealant for use in building and constructionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 6, 2009INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2008INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Sep 10, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2008INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
May 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 16, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED—
May 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance