Drawing for PROSELECT

USPTO serial 76630399

PROSELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROSELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

JOHN H WEBER BAKER & HOSTETLER LLPWASHINGTON SQ STE 11001050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land vehicle automatic transmission parts, namely, heavy duty clutches, passenger car clutches, medium duty truck clutches, high performance clutches, disc clutches, clutch covers, clutch pilot bearings, clutch pilot bushings, clutch master cylinders, and clutch slave cylinders; brake hardware for land vehicles, namely, automatic slack adjusters, brake pads, brake shoes, brake drums, brakerotors, and brake calipersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 30, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 30, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 11, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 16, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 21, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 17, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance