USPTO serial 76630660
LUDWIG DOETSCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUDWIG DOETSCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLPIP SECTION 1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Musical Instruments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brook Mays Music Company
- Other trademarks owned by Brook Mays Music Company
- Other trademarks owned by UNIVERSAL MELODY SERVICES
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named LUDWIG DOETSCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |