Drawing for SMART CANDLE

USPTO serial 76630886

SMART CANDLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3155669Status 712
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART CANDLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael T. Olsen

BRADLEY J WALZ WINTHROP & WEINSTINE PA225 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4629

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Battery-operated electronic controlled light that simulates the flame of a wax candleSECTION 37 - CANCELLEDDec 17, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 21, 2014C37.CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL—
Oct 12, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
Apr 26, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 26, 2012PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Apr 26, 2012PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Mar 1, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 18, 2011COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Oct 13, 2011PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2011EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 26, 2011PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
May 26, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2011ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 1, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance