Drawing for ARGENTIUM

USPTO serial 76631684

ARGENTIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARGENTIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S. Kashman

DAVID S KASHMAN GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008FLATWARE AND CUTLERY, NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS, PICKLE FORKS, SPOONS, TEA SPOONS, SPAGHETTI SPOONS, AND LASAGNA BLADESACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Dec 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Dec 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Nov 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Nov 26, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Nov 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Oct 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Oct 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Oct 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 13, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Apr 13, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Apr 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Apr 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Apr 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 27, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Sep 26, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTENโ€”
May 25, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
May 25, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
May 18, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTEREDโ€”
May 18, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVEDโ€”
May 10, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Apr 18, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 8, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Mar 8, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Mar 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Mar 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Mar 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Feb 10, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Feb 10, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Feb 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance