USPTO serial 76631759
ENHAND-CR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3462793Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2008
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENHAND-CR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant T. Langton
GRANT T. LANGTON SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.350 SOUTH GRAND AVE., SUITE 2600TWO CALIFORNIA PLAZALOS ANGELES, CA 90071-3406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gloves for protection against accidents, namely, cut resistant gloves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |